Your Tax Advisor in Finland
​

Effektiivi Oy, established in 2013, is a law firm and a trusted tax and legal service provider for companies and entrepreneurs, as well as for Finnish or foreign private individuals.  We  also provide highly effective, professional tax services for foreign companies establishing subsidiaries or branch offices in Finland, and for owners and private individuals who need assistance with cross-border tax issues. ​Whilst our advice is limited to Finnish taxes, we have associates through our international network that enable us to present global solutions for your tax issues. ​ 

Anu Nikkanen, a tax lawyer and Managing Partner at Effektiivi, has over 20 years of domestic and international tax experience with a "Big Four" accounting firm, and with the Finnish Tax Administration and the Tax Payer's Association in Finland.  Anu Nikkanen has also been a frequent lecturer on issues such as international taxation and foreign assignments.  She holds LL.M and M.A. degrees from the University of Helsinki.  


​Tax services for foreign companies 

​
​Effektiivi Oy offers a variety of expert international tax advisory services for foreign companies that are planning to either start permanent business operations in Finland or carry out short-term or one-time projects in Finland. 

If a non-Finnish company posts even one employee to work in Finland, or hires a local employee or engages a self-employed person in Finland, this may involve tax and legal obligations for both the non-Finnish company and for the individual working in Finland. Since sanctions for not fully complying with Finnish tax legislation may be imposed on both these individuals and the non-Finnish company, it is advisable to appoint a tax law professional to ensure that all tax, social security and other legal obligations are fully reviewed in Finland before the work commences. 

We provide professional tax advisory, tax compliance and legal services in connection with the following: 
  • Optimisation of structures for business operations in Finland 
  • Reviewing the non-Finnish company's income tax and value added tax obligations in Finland 
  • Entity selection and formation
  • Assistance with tax registrations and de-registrations
  • Preparation and filing of annual corporate income tax returns
  • Reviewing the employees' or assignees' tax residence status in Finland and advice on potential tax exemptions 
  • Reviewing the tax and legal obligations of subcontractors and self-employed individuals in Finland
  • Special reporting requirements in the construction sector 
  • Representation in tax audits and tax proceedings 
  • Tax and financial due diligence in co-operation with a partner audit firm​


​NEWS

 
​September 2021
Inheritance from the United States – new tax practice on the calculation of sales profit
On 6 September 2021, Finland’s Supreme Administrative Court (“SAC”) issued a judgement (KHO:2021:120) that provided long-awaited clarity to the calculation of sales profit when property inherited in the United States is sold by a Finnish tax resident individual. In the case, the Finnish tax resident beneficiary had received US listed shares as an inheritance from a decedent who, at the time of death, was a citizen of the United States and a resident of California. The beneficiary was entitled to a credit that reduced the Federal Estate (Inheritance) Tax and, thus, no Federal Estate Tax was due and no tax return was filed. Neither was the estate subject to a Californian State Tax. 
​
In accordance with the bilateral inheritance tax treaty concluded between Finland and the United States, Finland exempts some assets, including the shares of publicly listed US companies located in the United States, from Finnish inheritance tax. The beneficiary had filed with the Finnish Tax Administration an inheritance tax declaration in which, among others, the US shares were declared. The Tax Administration confirmed that no inheritance tax would be imposed on the beneficiary of the shares since, based on the tax treaty, they were exempt from tax in Finland. 

The beneficiary intended to sell the shares and applied for an advance ruling from the Central Tax Board in order to receive certainty on the tax consequences of the sales in Finland. 

In Finland, sales profit is calculated by deducting from the sales price both the acquisition price and the costs related to the acquisition and sales. When a private individual receives property as an inheritance, the “acquisition cost” is the value confirmed in the inheritance taxation. Alternatively, the sales profit may be calculated by using the so-called “deemed acquisition price” which is 40% of the sales price if the property has been owned for at least 10 years and 20% of the sales price if the property has been owned for less than 10 years.

The Central Tax Board issued a decision where the acquisition value of the shares in this case was EUR 0 and, consequently, only the deemed acquisition price could be applied. The beneficiary appealed this decision to the SAC and filed a claim that the actual market value of the shares on the acquisition date should be applied when calculating the sales profit. The SAC accepted the claim. In its reasoning the SAC concluded that the beneficiary had filed an inheritance tax declaration and, even though the Tax Administration had not imposed any inheritance tax, this did not imply that the shares were void of any value on the date of receipt. 

Specific tax rules apply to the proceeds received from the sales of assets gained, e.g., as an inheritance, or as a gift, or based on the distribution of property after a divorce. If these cases also include cross-border aspects, the tax implications should always be carefully reviewed. 
 April 2021
Filing due date for corporate income  tax returns extended by one month 
The Tax  Administration has announced that it extends the deadline for filing the corporate income tax returns.  The decision applies only to corporate entities whose accounting period ended on December 31, 2020. The tax returns can be filed by May 31, 2021. Normally, the tax returns must be filed within four months.  The new deadline  applies to all corporate entities, such as associations, housing companies, real estate companies, foreign corporations, cooperatives and investment funds.
 February 2021
New tax requirements to be introduced for shipyards 
Currently, anyone who has been engaged to work  at a construction site or on an installation project in Finland must apply to the Tax Administration for a tax number (veronumero) before commencing employment. In addition, before the tax number can be issued, the worker must have obtained a Finnish personal identity code. When actually working at the site, workers must wear a name tag with their photo and tax number. Each individual’s tax number will also have been entered in the Tax Administration’s tax number register. 

On February 4, 2021, the Finnish Government proposed (HE 2/2021 vp) that all employees and self-employed persons working in shipyards must also apply for the tax number. The tax number registration is valid for a fixed-term of three years, after which time the worker should renew the registration. When passed into law, this new requirement would apply only to bigger shipyards where vessels longer than 24 meters are built or repaired.  The requirement would enter into force on July 1, 2022. 
 January 2021
Economic employer concept was introduced in Sweden from January 1, 2021​
Economic employer 
According to the Special Income Tax Act for Non-Residents (SINK), a foreign employee employed by a foreign employer will no longer be exempt from tax in Sweden, if the employee’s work in Sweden is deemed to be part of a staffing arrangement entered into with a Swedish company. In such a case, the Swedish company will be regarded as the employee's economic employer and the employee will be taxed in Sweden from the first workday. The decisive factor determining taxation will be for whom the employee works, and not who pays the salary. 

​Only work carried out in Sweden for a very limited period – defined as a maximum of 15 consecutive working days, or a maximum of 45 working days per calendar year – will be exempted from the new rules.

Foreign employers will be required to withhold tax in Sweden for employees who are covered by the economic employer concept. As a consequence, foreign employers will also be obligated to register for PAYE purposes in Sweden. 

Withholding of tax in no-employment situations 
Swedish companies must withhold preliminary tax of 30% on payments to foreign companies for work carried out in Sweden unless such companies are registered for F-tax at the Swedish Tax Agency. 
Also foreign companies must withhold preliminary tax of 30% on payments for work performed in Sweden unless the recipient of the payments is registered for F-tax at the Swedish Tax Agency. 

Specific information required by the Swedish Tax Agency 
The Swedish Tax Agency requires certain information from foreign self-employed individuals and from companies without a permanent establishment in Sweden in order to assess whether there is a tax liability in Sweden or not. Information regarding the time spent in Sweden and the nature of the work performed in Sweden must therefore be submitted to the Swedish Tax Agency. 
​
The Swedish Tax Agency is preparing guidelines regarding the precise nature of the information to be submitted to the Swedish Tax Agency. These guidelines are not yet available. The information must be filed annually and the due date will be the same as the due date for income tax returns.
​
Actions 
The rules above represent a significant change for the Finnish companies that do business in Sweden. The transition to an economic employer concept will require Finnish companies to identify and analyze those employees that may be taxable in Sweden from the first workday. Finnish companies and subcontractors will also need to assess whether they must be registered for F-tax in Sweden and what will be required in order to comply with the new rules. 
​October 2020
Government proposal issued: non-Finnish corporations whose place of effective management is in Finland will be treated as tax residents of Finland 
In Finland, taxpayers are subject to either limited tax liability or unlimited tax liability. A non-Finnish corporation is a non-resident of Finland and is subject to limited tax liability. It is liable to pay income tax only on its Finnish-sourced income, including trade and business. Assuming a non-Finnish corporation has a permanent establishment in Finland, Finland has the right to tax only the income attributed to this permanent establishment. By contrast, a Finnish corporation is a tax resident of Finland and is subject to unlimited tax liability.  In the current tax practice, a corporation is deemed as a Finnish tax resident only when it is established or incorporated in accordance with Finnish legislation. 

In the Government proposal (HE 136/2020), issued on 1 October 2020, amendments are being proposed to the Finnish Income Tax Act. According to the proposal, corporations subject to unlimited tax liability will include not only Finnish corporations, but also non-Finnish corporations, if their “place of effective management” is in Finland. The bill defines the place of effective management as the location where the corporation’s significant daily management decisions are made.   

The proposal aims to expand and secure Finland’s right of taxation in cases where a corporation is established abroad while the owners, management and activities are based in Finland. Thus, e.g. non-Finnish companies whose effective management is in Finland would also become tax residents of Finland. Tax residency would lead to an obligation to file an income tax return and declare worldwide income in Finland.

If the proposal is passed and becomes law, these amendments to the legislation will be effective as of January 1, 2021.
 September 2020
New precedent from the Supreme Administrative Court on the taxation of foreign athletes in Finland
Signing bonuses are commonly paid to athletes in connection with signing a letter of intent or a team player contract. The signing bonus is usually considered as compensation for entering into a contract and as a reward for not playing for any other league during the term of the contract. It is paid in addition to the athlete’s base salary and performance bonuses, which in return are paid to the player in exchange for specific services rendered. 

Foreign non-resident individuals are subject to tax in Finland only with respect to so-called Finnish-sourced income. Under Section 10 (4b) of the Finnish Income Tax Act, income received for personal performance as an athlete or artist in Finland is deemed as Finnish-sourced income and is therefore subject to taxation in Finland. The tax treaties Finland has concluded with other countries rarely prevent Finland from taxing this income. Usually, a salary paid to an athlete who is a non-resident of Finland at the moment of making the payment is taxed in accordance with the provisions of the Act on the Taxation of Non-Residents' Income. Thus, a non-resident tax at source of 15% is deducted from the compensation. However, in its precedent KHO:2020:96, issued on 17 September 2020, the Supreme Administrative Court ended  up with a different outcome. 
​
In the case at hand, a Finnish employer, whom we can call “Employer Ltd”, had concluded preliminary player contracts for periods of two or three seasons with a number of non-Finnish ice hockey players for playing in the team of Employer Ltd in Finland. The players were obligated to refund the signing bonus if they subsequently chose to play for another league instead. It was also agreed in the contract that Employer Ltd, and not the players, would pay the income taxes due on the players’ salaries in Finland; i.e. net salary agreements were concluded. At the time the contracts were signed and the signing bonuses were paid, the players were non-residents of Finland. But the players became Finnish tax residents when they started performing services for the team of Employer Ltd in Finland. 

A tax audit was then performed on Employer Ltd. It was argued by the tax auditors that the signing bonuses had been paid in lieu of salaries only in order to avoid the higher progressive income taxation levied on resident individuals in Finland. As a result, based on the audit report, unpaid withholding taxes were imposed on Employer Ltd. According to the Supreme Administrative Court  (SAC), the signing bonuses were actually related to the sporting activities the players had performed while they were tax residents of Finland. Based on the background information, the total amount of each athlete’s signing bonus and base salary during the first season was roughly the same as the total base salary paid during the second season. For example, for one player the net salary for the first season was EUR 20,000, while for the second season it was EUR 140,000. His signing bonus had amounted to EUR 120,000 net. The SAC therefore deemed that, in these circumstances, the signing bonuses should have been considered as a part of the net salaries received for the first season, and that they should have been subject to progressive withholding tax, rather than a non-resident tax at source of 15%. It was also explicitly stated in the decision that the 15% tax at source card granted by the Tax Administration did not give the employer any “protection of legitimate expectations”. 

The decision KHO:2020:96 does not imply that signing bonuses paid to non-resident athletes before they move to Finland should always be considered as salary income for their playing services performed in Finland, or that the signing bonuses should be subject to the withholding tax levied on resident individuals. The tax treatment depends on the contents of each contract and on the definition of the signing bonus, as well as the structure of the athlete’s entire compensation package. In Finland, it is the employer that primarily carries the tax consequences of not deducting the correct taxes, and the Tax Administration may recover the owed amounts from the employer later.  In addition, punitive tax increases and charges for negligence are often imposed. Thus, the tax consequences should be carefully reviewed beforehand in all such cases.


​Tax services for foreign employees and executives ​

We provide a wide array of tax and social security planning and compliance services for foreign employees and executives on assignment in Finland, including: 
  • Planning the assignment or employment structure to minimize worldwide income tax and social security tax burdens 
  • Tax relief applications for highly skilled specialists and other expatriate taxation services
  • Preparation of Finnish income tax returns and other required filings for foreign individuals with cross-border tax issues
  • Assistance with the calculation of gross-ups of assignment allowances and tax equalization computations
  • Resident and non-resident tax card applications
  • Personal investment income tax advisory and planning services during foreign assignments 

​Tax disputes and civil tax litigation

Domestic tax legislation and the tax treaties related especially to private individuals and entities with dual or multiple residence are often very complex. In addition, tax decisions may occasionally be based on incorrect or incomplete facts, or unclear tax regulations may be interpreted  to the taxpayer’s disadvantage. If the Tax Administration believes that the taxpayer has made erroneous  deductions or tax credit claims, or if the taxpayer has mistakenly failed to file a tax return or to report any foreign-sourced income or assets in Finland, this could substantially increase the tax bill while also incurring penalties and interest. In the most serious cases, it could even lead to criminal charges.

​We represent all types of taxpayers in tax disputes and civil tax litigation. We advise on how to become compliant, if tax filings have mistakenly not been fully completed for prior years, or if any disputes have arisen with the Tax Administration concerning the amount of tax you should pay in Finland. We also assist clients in civil matters by providing expertise regarding substantive tax laws, by dealing directly with the Tax Administration on the taxpayer's behalf, and by pursuing administrative appeals before the administrative courts. 

We may also help with the application of a so-called advance ruling to achieve a tax certainty in more complex tax matters. 
 May 2020
The Estonian tax system in a nutshell
Estonia is known for its corporate tax system which does not tax retained earnings, instead the distribution of corporate profits, including hidden profit distributions (e.g. fringe benefits, non-business related expenses), are subject to income tax. The company is required to submit the tax return and pay tax by the 10th day of the calendar month following the month the payment was made. 

The profit distribution is subject to the income tax of 20% of the gross amount (distributable amount + income tax). This corresponds to 25% (20/80) of the net amount of the distribution. Since the dividends are subject to tax on the level of the company, received dividends are tax exempt in the hands of the shareholder. Nevertheless, the received dividends are included in the calculation of personal annual allowance of the shareholder.

If the company distributes profits regularly, the tax rate could be reduced up to 14% (net tax rate 14/86, i.e. 16.28%). The lower rate applies to the amount which is smaller than or equal to the average distributed profit of the previous three calendar years on which the company has paid income tax. If dividends subject to 14% are distributed to a resident or non-resident individual, the recipient is subject to an additional 7% withholding tax, unless the tax treaty provides lower tax rate. In case the recipient of the dividends is a company, there is no withholding tax and the final tax on dividends in Estonia would be 14%.

​Estonian resident individuals are subject to tax on their worldwide income. The tax rate is 20% and the taxpayer is entitled to deduct annual allowance (EUR 6,000 per year), housing loan interests, educational expenses, certain gifts and donations, unemployment insurance contributions and pension contributions. The deductions are limited to EUR 1,200, including housing loan interest deduction up to EUR 300. Furthermore, the taxpayer is allowed to deduct 20% of its rental income received from the rental of a dwelling.
The taxable period for individuals is the calendar year. The tax return must be submitted by 30th April of the year following the tax year and the income tax is due by 1 October. 
 April 2020
Filing due date for corporate income  tax returns extended by one month
​The Tax  Administration has announced on April 9 that it extends the deadline for filing the corporate income tax return due to the current exceptional circumstances.  The tax return can now be filed within five months from the end of the accounting period. Normally, the tax return must be filed within four months.  The decision applies to corporate entities whose accounting period ended between December 2019 and February 2020. The new deadline  applies to all corporate entities, such as associations, housing companies, real estate companies, foreign corporations, cooperatives and investment funds.
January 2020
Personal income tax return for 2019 – due dates and administrative tax penalties 
Finland’s Tax Administration will send a pre-completed tax return form for 2019 to individual taxpayers in March-April 2020. The due dates for filing the tax return are 5 May, or 12 May, or 19 May 2020. The due date that applies to you is marked in the tax return form. If a taxpayer does not receive any tax return form, but is nevertheless liable to file a tax return, the due date will be 19 May 2020. Self-employed individuals will need to file their personal tax return by 2 April 2020. If a tax return is filed after the due date, but before the end of the tax assessment period, the fee for late return will be 50 euros for individual taxpayers. The end date for tax assessment is also marked in the pre-completed tax return form. 

While the fee for late return (but before the end of the tax assessment period) is low, the tax increases imposed for other errors or oversights may be substantial and are mostly percentage-based in Finland. A tax increase will be imposed if, for example, a tax return is filed after the tax assessment period has ended, or if the tax return or information in the tax return is incomplete, or if the form has been incorrectly filled in. If, for example, an individual claims, by mistake, that a foreign tax credit is deductible in Finland (whereas it should have been claimed as deductible in the other country), a tax increase will be imposed. 

The tax increase is usually between 2 and 10 per cent of an increase in taxable income. Such increase in taxable income may result from the taxpayer’s failure to report certain income, or from the taxpayer mistakenly claiming that non-deductible expenses are deductible in the tax return form. A tax increase may also be imposed even if, for example, the taxpayer paid taxes in some other country, but failed to declare in the Finnish tax return the income that would have been entitled to a full tax credit in Finland.  In some cases, a tax increase is imposed based on an increase in the amount of taxes normally liable to be paid. In these cases, the tax increase may be between 2 and 50 per cent of the increase in the amount of taxes. Furthermore, if the taxpayer has erroneously declared non-Finnish earned income in the tax return form as capital income, instead of earned income (as a result of which the tax will be lower), a tax increase will be imposed on the basis of the amount of taxes. In some cases, however, the tax increase may be lowered or dismissed. It should also be noted that, in addition to the tax increases, late payment interest will also be imposed. 

The imposition of a tax increase does not require any willful or negligent conduct by the taxpayer. In Finnish tax practice, tax increases may also be imposed even if an individual fails to understand the instructions for completing the tax return forms.  Therefore, it is advisable to seek professional advice with respect to more complex tax affairs when filing your annual tax return. 
October 2019
Non-Finnish key employees’ salary income tax will decrease to 32%
​The Government has proposed amendments to the Act governing the tax-at-source of so-called key employees working temporarily in Finland. As of 1996, certain key employees have been eligible for a tax-at-source of 35% on income from employment instead of the progressive taxation. The regime is applicable for a maximum period of four years. 
The Government has proposed in its Bill that the tax-at-source will decrease to 32%. The new tax rate would be applied to salary income paid as from 1st of January 2020. Currently the Act is provisional, but in the Government Bill it is also proposed that the Act will be permanent. 
July 2019
New reporting obligations related to beneficial owners 
​As of  1st of July, 2019 most companies, including all non-listed limited liability companies and co-operatives, must file a notification of their actual beneficial owners with the Finnish Trade Register. This requirement is based on the Finnish Act on Money Laundering and the underlying EU directive. The Act on Money Laundering defines the beneficial owner as a person who either owns a company or otherwise exercises control over the company. The notification of beneficial owners should be submitted during the period from 1st of July 2019 to 1st of July 2020, and thereafter whenever the details change or a new company is set up. 

The notification should be filed online at ytj.fi. The online service is available in Finnish and Swedish.  Only in exceptional cases may a paper notification be filed. A company may authorize a representative to file the notification on behalf of the company. The details on beneficial owners are not published in the Trade Register. Only parties with a purpose of use in accordance with the Act on Money Laundering can obtain the details from the Trade Register. 
July 2019
Taxing rights of Finland: new tax practice from the Administrative Court  
​In the recent case heard by the Administrative Court of Helsinki (11.7.2019 19/0508/3), a limited liability company established in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China had received income related to a temporary work project in Finland. The company was a Finnish non-resident and had no permanent establishment for income tax purposes in Finland. The company had applied for a so-called 0% withholding tax card from the Finnish Tax Administration. 

Finland and Hong Kong had no double tax treaty in place at the time since the treaty did not enter into force until 1st of January 2019. Therefore, only the domestic tax legislation was applied when reviewing the company’s tax liability in Finland. According to the Administrative Court, the Tax Administration should not have granted the 0% tax-at-source card. The Administrative Court argued that Finland had the right to tax  so-called Finnish source income in the absence of a double tax treaty  even though no permanent establishment has been created in Finland. Thus, the Finnish payer should have been liable to withhold a tax of 13% from any compensation paid to the company. This decision is not final and may be appealed to the Supreme Administrative Court. 
March 2019
The sale of virtual currencies should be taxed as capital gains and losses on sales also become tax deductible 
The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) issued a decision on 29th of March 2019 according to which provisions on the taxation of profits from the sales of assets are applied to the trading virtual currencies with official currencies (e.g. with euros). 

The SAC decision changes the current tax practice that was also outlined in the Tax Administration's guidelines and, according to which, trading in virtual currencies is based on an agreement between the seller and the buyer. Thus, the Finnish Income Tax Act's provisions regulating the taxation of profits from the sales of assets have not been applied to the realized increase in the value of virtual currencies. As a result of this, the so-called deemed acquisition cost, which is 20% for assets held for less than 10 years and 40% for assets held for 10 years or longer, has not been applied in the tax practice to trading in virtual currencies. Any decreases in value in connection of trading virtual currencies have either not been treated as a tax deductible loss.  

In the SAC case a private individual planned to sell ether virtual currency in exchange for euros or US dollars. The Central Tax Board initially stipulated in its ruling, valid for the period 1st of January 2017 - 31st of December 2017, that the profit should be deemed as other capital income, not profit from the sale of property. However, the SAC overruled  the Central Tax Board's decision and found that virtual currency is the kind of property that would have been classified as taxable property under the interpretation of the Property Tax Act. Therefore, it should not be excluded from the concept of property as determined in the Income Tax Act. Likewise, any profit received for trading ether virtual currency in exchange for euros or US dollars should be regulated by the Income Tax Act's provisions on the taxation of profits from the sales of assets. 

​
​​​Individual income tax planning 


​We offer tax consulting services for high net worth and other private individuals and families either intending to move to Finland or already residing there. 
​Our services include both cross-border and domestic tax advisory: 
  • Analysis of your current and future tax situations, based on the domestic tax legislation and tax treaties 
  • Review of the income tax and declaration liabilities in Finland
  • Tax exemption or tax credit claims 
  • Preparation of income tax returns and tax computations
  • Communication with the Finnish tax authorities on your behalf
  • Investment and pension tax planning
  • Inheritance and gift tax planning​
  • Tax planning for entertainers and sports professionals 
  • Business structuring 
  • Cryptocurrency taxation
  • Cross-border social security advisory and applications 
  • Tax advisory related to a move away from Finland
Effektiivi is a Corporate Supporter of the Finnish Natural Heritage Foundation, helping to protect old standing forest locally. As part of its corporate responsibility, Effektiivi also protects threatened habitats internationally through the World Land Trust. 
November 2018 
Minimum share capital requirements to be eliminated
On 22nd of November 2018, a Government Bill (HE 238/2018) was issued proposing elimination of the minimum share capital requirement (EUR 2,500) for Finnish private limited liability companies (osakeyhtiöt).  This change would also apply to limited liability housing companies. The purpose of the Bill is to ease the operations of micro and small undertakings, and generally to improve the conditions for corporate activity. The change would be effective as of 1st of July 2019.
February 2018 
US citizens residing in Finland 
US citizens and US tax residents ("US Persons") are taxed in the United States on their worldwide income no matter where in the world they reside.  The US taxes based on citizenship, which is different than almost all other countries in the world that tax based on residence. This often catches US Persons who have never lived in the US or have lived abroad for a number years by surprise.  Any US Person living abroad with income for tax year 2017 above  specific  income thresholds must file a US tax return. E.g.  for a single  person under 65 years of age the income threshold is only USD 10,400. 

A US Person has a US tax filing obligation even if the US Person has never lived in the US or left several years ago and their income is from foreign (non-US) sources.  The US Person has a US tax filing obligation even if some or all of the income was taxed at source or is going to be taxed by the resident foreign country, e.g. by  Finland.   

The IRS also wants to know about money US Persons have in foreign bank accounts.  There are now two different reporting requirements for foreign bank accounts, the Foreign Bank Account Report (“FBAR”) and the individual reporting requirement under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”). The penalties for not filing are significant.

The due date for a US personal income tax return (Form 1040) is April 15 of each year.  US Persons living in Finland receive an automatic extension of time to file the tax return and pay any taxes due without penalty until June 15.  However, if there are taxes due, interest will be calculated starting on April 15. A US Person can receive an automatic extension of time allowing until October 15 to file their US tax return.  This extension does not extend the time to pay the tax due, so penalties and interest will be added for payments received after the tax filing deadline.  US Persons who are outside the US can request a discretionary 2-month additional extension of time to file their US tax return allowing until December 15 to file.  The failure to file an informational filing carries significant penalties.  

US tax filings for US Persons residing abroad are often complex and require numerous informational filings.  Since US Persons living in Finland are tax resident both in Finland and in the US, mitigation of double taxation should also be carefully reviewed.
​
Please contact us if you need further information or help with the tax return filings  in Finland or in the US. 
January 2018 
Economic employer in Finland - new tax practise
Many countries have been applying a so-called economic employer approach in the taxation of assignees and business travellers. The Finnish Tax Administration has instead generally applied a concept of a  legal employer in the context of assignees' taxation. As the result, the employee’s salary paid for the work in Finland is not subject to tax here under the so-called 183-day principle provided the employee continues to have an employment agreement with the home country employer that also pays his/her salary during the temporary work in Finland.  In practise, this has meant that Finland does not usually tax employees working in Finland for a short period of time if the employer does not have any presence (a permanent establishment) in Finland. The exception is hired-out employees. Several tax treaties that Finland has concluded, e.g. with the Baltic and Nordic countries, allow Finland to tax hired-out personnel from the first day of employment in Finland. 

In the recently published decision by the Administrative Court of Helsinki a so called economic employer concept was however applied for the first time. The decision was issued on January 16, 2018. 

In the decision of the Administrative Court, a country manager had an employment agreement with a UK limited company which also had paid the employee’s salary. The salary costs had been charged to a branch of a Danish A/S located in Finland. The Administrative Court referred to the economic employer concept when determining which entity is the employer under Article 16.2 of the tax treaty between Finland and the UK. It seems that the Administrative Court made the decision based on cost allocation to the branch and the fact that the work would have been performed mainly on the account of the branch. Therefore, Finland would have had the right to tax the salary income. In practise no tax was imposed for the applicable tax years since the tax payer had relied on the tax authorities’ guidelines and former tax practise.  

It should be noted that this decision was by a 2-1 vote.  It was also applied in specific circumstances and, therefore, its application to other inbound assignments should be reviewed an a case-by-case basis. However, the decision  indicates that in future the companies should more carefully investigate the potential tax liabilities of assignees and business travellers to avoid unplanned tax consequences in Finland. 
January 2018 
New residence permit type for startups 
Legislative changes will be introduced to facilitate the immigration of startup entrepreneurs and expert employees to Finland as from April 1, 2018. A new residence permit type will be introduced  for startup entrepreneurs. The permit would be granted by the Finnish Immigration Service after the Business Finland innovation funding agency has made a business assessment.  The estimated handling time for the application would be a few weeks and the first permit would be  issued for two years. It has also been proposed that expert employees' first residence permit would be  issued for  2 years instead of the current 1 year.  

Extensions  of all residence permits  may in future be filed  online, without personally visiting the Finnish Immigration Service. 
November 2017 
Education in the “interest of the employer” will be tax exempt as from 2018 
The Finnish Parliament has approved the Government Bill for the amendment of the Finnish Income Tax Act.  Until now, there has not been any specific stipulation concerning the taxation of employer-provided education. The costs of basic or higher education reimbursed by the employer have been generally deemed as a taxable benefit for the employee. There are, however, various tax practises on this matter.

Under the new Article 69b of the Finnish Income Tax Act, the employer may reimburse the employee for the costs of the education tax-free if this takes place “in the interest of the employer”. As a result of this amendment to the law, an employer may more often provide tax-free educational assistance to the employee. This would also comprise e.g. reimbursement of fees for tuition, leading to a degree. 
July 2017 
Posting employees to Finland? - a notification duty enters into force as from September 1, 2017
A foreign company posting employees to Finland should notify the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSH) in Finland. The reporting duty enters into force on the 1st of September 2017. The notification should be filed before the work in Finland commences. The reporting requirement applies if employees are posted by the same company to Finland for more than 5 days during the previous four months.  In the construction sector the notification should always be filed. The notification should be filed electronically. The information required in the notification includes e.g. identifying details of the company (e.g. tax ID), contractor details, estimated number of the posted employees, identifying details of the representative in Finland, starting date and work location.  

The failure to comply with the legislation (a reporting liability or an obligation to appoint a representative) may lead to sanctions, amounting to EUR 1,000-10,000. We would be happy to provide further information.  
January 2017 
The period for appealing taxation has been amended
Individuals and companies may seek a change to their taxation decision by filing a written claim to the Taxation Adjustment Board. The decision of the Taxation Adjustment Board can be appealed to the Administrative Court. Further, the decision of Administrative court can be appealed to the Supreme Administrative court provided it grants leave to appeal. Also previously, the appeals should have been filed within a specific period. As from 2017, the period for appealing taxation was shortened, and the appeal should be filed significantly earlier.  For the tax period beginning 1 January 2017 3-year time period will be applied. The period for appealing taxation to the Administrative Court dramatically changed as well since, according to the amended legislation, the appeal shall be filed in 60 days.
November 2016 
Totalization agreement between Finland and China 
​Totalization agreement between Finland and China will enter into force on 1 February 2017. The agreement would cover pension and unemployment benefits. As of result of the agreement, Finnish employees posted temporarily to work in China may remain covered by the Finnish pension and unemployment scheme for five years.  
October 2016 
Since 1 January 2016 royalties paid from Finland to Estonia have been exempted from tax at source 
In accordance with a tax treaty between Finland and Estonia, Finland has had the right to tax royalties arising in Finland and paid to a resident in Estonia.  The tax at source has been 5%-10%. 

However, due to new developments no tax at source can be levied on royalties paid from Finland to Estonia.  This change was introduced when Estonia agreed with another tax treaty country that royalties should be taxable only in the recipient’s home state. Based on the so called most-favoured nation clause this same principle applies retroactively also to the Finnish-Estonian tax treaty and royalties covered by this agreement. 
June 2016
Law on posted employees  amended 
The new legislation on posted employees entered into force on 18 of June 2016. The amended new law is applied to foreign companies and it imposes new obligations to the companies posting employees temporarily to work in Finland. The law does not as such introduce new changes to the employment conditions of the posted employees. The major new requirement is that the foreign employer is obliged to report to the occupational safety and health authorities that the company is posting employees to Finland. Earlier, companies did not have such reporting liabilities. The notification requirement will enter into force during 2017. The law introduced also new penalty payments. 
Legal Disclaimer 

The information in this site has been prepared for general informational purposes only and it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with a professional tax, legal or other competent advisor.  While we have made every attempt to ensure that the information contained in this site has been obtained from reliable sources, Effektiivi Oy is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information.